Speaking yesterday, the circle, and now also into the circle of the commentary. The circle of some friends, but added guest over their activities. But really did not get off serious commentary, and occasionally write about nothing on earth essays, often criticized for pretext. ; the. In the morning after opening their official website, see the edge. That Red Net to comment contest, I actually have the honor out the judges.
previously did not write commentary, because a little ridiculous. For one thing, not the school work points, the second newspaper to be afraid of change hh manuscript. In this question, I got valuable advice, thank Xiao Yu Lu Gaofeng Zhuxiong hate inspired the courage to overcome obstacles I can try today.
exclusive column requirements, it is understandable. but was published, I was in the back up a blog.'ve learned to do analysis of the case Shaohua, ahead of my originals, followed by the version published in the paper. comparison is meaningful, allow me to study media scale and editorial policy at the end for professional studies can be considered.
first, but also little new. but a consistent point of view, and strive to make commentary style. I hope the next, more familiar with the topic of exercise point, it seems to always read the news ranks, huh mm
Morning Post, blog follow-up, why the topic has been extended to the fight against the influx of Western culture, and why China will not get the master. Shanghai Book Fair ended several days, the argument is still heard.
qualified to discredit the older generation? This is really close to the irony of Jun sentence, almost contradictory position obfuscation.
epigenetic have the authority to appraise President? is almost self-evident nonsense. In literature evaluation, we can not do the standard default, or else not to mention Mao Dun, Ba Jin old couple, afraid that even Guo Guo Lao, or even noble, Yang Shuo two predecessors, will always be teaching in the first card. Even if the son of Lu Xun Roof, also allows an academic discussion of it, at least we can be in the Weeds ?
Chen Danqing criticism in recent years, of course, not only in the literary arts. But who provides that the artist can only Soave so many Other experts in the field, he is not the audience that field? audience can become a communicator? Is not that what the audience have the opportunity to become a communicator, be considered as evidence of social progress it? advocate of the Internet, not always talking about deconstruction of elite grass-roots ? You can only say the criticism is not the authority of Chen Danqing criticism, but can not say that Chen Danqing not criticize authority.
then seduce Lu Xun was also old poor, and Chen Danqing support themselves, that is diverted when the poet is willing to see him. But I do not think Chen Danqing poet, at least not do as the poet Zhao Lihua Zhao-Hill.
course some people will argue that: Why They wrote so many dark? or Russell's sentence, quoted Chen Danqing I also have: knowledge of what elements are bad citizens. This is not to say that he would go to the text on behalf of the conference to make trouble, you see, Chen Danqing led to Tsinghua wrote, organized and disciplined and even respectful. Shuo said, You can not let them pick up a pen it: Perhaps the question should not be literary criticism, Chen Danqing never used personal attacks mm of course, does not stint in recognition of the kind words, he respected the heart wood is also incurred criticism. The only states a fact: Chen Danqing think with their brains, he independent value judgments, even though he paint, but not a painter.
time to time, Chen Danqing must the media type of business the pursuit of yellow journalism. People accused Chen Danqing speculation, but who is making sensational headlines? he was just the usual calm and elegant, made the personal views of their predecessors. People may not agree with his views, but he should not agree to disagree.
Finally, also on the hh I know what to say. Do not forget, Lu Xun is not a written commentary on it? catching up with Zhao Lihua Hu's poetry. Think about it, why they do today to become a master? Chen Danqing there is a condition from the master: time. But I do not want to say this, because the attitude of the genius, you know, flattery and Bangsha equally dire.
The following is a revised version published in the paper, transferred from the Modern Express Web site:
Chen Danqing should not shut up scholars have their final say
【Column】
Wang Shaolei sight a lot of media articles published sequence shelling literary master Chen Danqing question: is not hype books? can not the less so? even take up with the blog media network into, the topic has been extended to why the fight against the influx of Western culture, and why China will not get the master. Shanghai Book Fair ended several days, the argument is still heard.
(8 月 27 Mr. Judgments right? self-evident. evaluation of the literature, we can not do the default value, or not to mention Mao Dun, Ba Jin old couple, afraid that even Guo, or even noble, Yang Shuo, and always will be teaching in the first card. Even Lu Xun Roof son, also allows for an academic discussion of it, at least we can be in the ?
Chen Danqing criticism in recent years, of course, not only in the literary arts. But who provides that the artist can only chemist, philosopher, poet hh)? why not accept Chen Danqing efforts in other areas?
Chen Danqing not even experts in other fields, he is also the field of audience. the audience can not express the opinion? We are not always talk about the How wonderful, how many years you do not leave generous attempts hh ill-conceived, and Chen Danqing support themselves, that is diverted when the poet is required. but I do not think Chen Danqing poet, at least not to do as a poet Zhao Lihua Zhao-Shan .
course some people will argue: Why They wrote so many dark? or Russell's sentence, quoted Chen Danqing I also have: knowledge of what elements are bad citizens. This is not to say that he would like to make trouble, Look to the Qinghua Chen Danqing leaders wrote, organized and disciplined and even respectful. Shuo said, is the publicity officer of the unit. you can not let them pick up a pen he wrote: . Netizens dragged out to Han shot, in literary criticism, Chen Danqing never used a personal attack. The only states a fact: Chen Danqing think with their brains, he has an independent value judgments, although he painting , but not the painter.
time to time, Chen Danqing will be Chen Danqing blamed speculation, but who is making sensational headlines? he was just the usual calm and elegant, made the personal views of their predecessors. People may not agree with his views, but should not let him speak .
Finally, also on the Lu Xun is not a written commentary on it? Think about it, why they do today to become a master? Chen Danqing there is a condition from the master: time. But I do not want to say this, because the attitude of the genius, you know, stick equally horrific killing and flattery.
(Department of Nanjing Normal University Teachers)
No comments:
Post a Comment